[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Framers" <framers@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: two tables--similar information
From: Rick.Henkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:25:15 -0500
cc: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
<Someone suggested using text insets from another document containing
<the table, but that would only work if the complete table is
identical <in the two places. You seem to indicate that only two
COLUMNS are <identical, so you cannot use text insets in that case (to
my <knowledge).
That's what I thought. If I did the text insets, I could set the reference
to manually update. But I'd still need to reformat and sort the table.
<Unless you can organize the tables and the information in some other
<way (split the table, convert columns to rows, or some such), I think
<that cross-references is the easiest solution. However, they will
<show up as links in HTML and PDF... Beware that table-sorting has a
<bug that sometimes deletes all markers included in the text cells!
Oh! I'd forgotten about the table-sorting bug. Looks like the
cross-references may be the best way to go.
Thanks all.
rick
===========================================================================
=====
Any opinions expressed here are mine and do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of First Data.
===========================================================================
=====
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **