[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Lee, Ivan" <ilee@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The Facts (WAS: Distiller Trivia (WAS RE: Frame 6 files only-- distilling in Black and White - help!))
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:52:19 -0800
Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, framers@xxxxxxxxx
In-Reply-To: <LISTMANAGER-25396-18039-2002.03.21-11.39.30--isaacs#adobe.com@lists.raycomm.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
In short, a qualified "yes!"
- Dov
At 3/21/2002 10:38 AM, Lee, Ivan wrote:
>This has been a very enlightnening thread. One thing I'd like
>clarified. A "yes" or "no" answer will suffice. In the past I had
>onced asked why using "Save As" was wrong if the resulting PDF looked
>fine and acted fine. (We don't Save As anymore, by the way). Most of
>the standard reasons came up. But this is the first time I've heard
>that when you print to a printer driver instance other than Distiller,
>the PDF inherits the limitations of that printer (imageable areas, paper
>size, color, etc.).
>
>So as I understand it now, when we used "Save As," it meant that
>whatever driver instance it was printing to (which was most likely our
>physical printer's driver instance), the PDF inherited our physical
>printer's limitations? Is this correct - and is this what you mean when
>a PDF is device dependent...that the PDF will print correctly when
>hardcopy printed on our printer, but may not necessarily come out
>correct if printed to a different physical printer?
>
>When FM 7 comes out with the new and improved "Save As" function,
>this'll all be moot, but I'd like to know all the same. Much thanks for
>all the info.
>
>Ivan Lee
>Senior Technical Writer
>Bank of Hawaii
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **