[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Fred Ma <fma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Rumour: FM really is dead
From: Chuck Hastings <cwh2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:40:08 -0800
References: <16lusv86vdf4kqop2u37hoq95osllc0l5a@4ax.com> <3FCFE784.5587904B@doe.carleton.ca>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Hello Framers,
MSWord driving out FrameMaker is simply one more
corollary to Gresham's Law, like
Bad software drives out good.
How would Adobe feel about the Linux open-software
folks creating a free lookalike, to be ready whenever
FrameMaker support officially gets deep-sixed, to be
called maybe
`FlameMaker?'
Chuck Hastings cwh2@earthlink.net
Vintage Silicon Logic San José and Seattle
=========================================
Fred Ma wrote:
> The baffling thing is that Adobe doesn't consider FM
> worthwhile. How can that be? We live in a capitalist
> environment. There is no product (that I know of, not
> that I'm any final authority) that even begins to
> rival FM for technical composition. (I distinguish
> composition from document preparation; for the latter,
> the assumption is that the content and approximate
> format has been predetermined). How can an application
> for which there are no substitutes (not even remotely)
> be not worthwhile? Surely, the market for the application
> is not small. Alas, I feel the conversation drifting
> in the same direction that it has drifted before. It is
> because Word has become so cheap that the bean counters
> (no respect intended, it is a critical role) have forced
> the propeller heads to use Word. Maybe, despite its
> awesome functionality, elegance, and stability, the
> cost of FM is more than the market can bear. This doesn't
> necessarily mean that Adobe is pocketing too much (it
> obviously feels that it can't get enough for FM without
> giving up market share). It may simply be that continual
> development of such a (much better) tool requires too
> much resources.
>
> The argument put forth in the past was that FM's greater
> expense more than pays for itself before too long. That
> may (or may not) be true. It doesn't matter, so long as
> the bean counters don't see that. The market has spoken,
> and rightly or wrongly, it will lumber down the path it
> has chosen (to the sadness of FM users everywhere).
>
> Former responses to this topic include the testimony that
> FM training courses are alive and well. If so, that is a
> welcome relief, since it makes it less likely that FM will
> truly be dropped. Whether that testimony is still accurate
> today, only the instructors can say. And who knows how
> much of any effect that has on the decision of dropping FM.
> Who can say what goes on in the minds of the visionaries at
> Adobe.
>
> Fred
>
> ** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
> ** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **