[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Lindsay Burrell <lburrell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Need clear screenshots
From: Dov Isaacs <isaacs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:24:49 -0800
Cc: Framers List <framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
In-reply-to: <KMEMKPAOBOEEHCFLLAGCEEJOCFAA.lburrell@convedia.com>
References: <LYRIS-139666-451803-2004.01.07-11.23.24--lburrell#convedia.com@lists.FrameUsers.com><KMEMKPAOBOEEHCFLLAGCEEJOCFAA.lburrell@convedia.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
If Snag-It can save as TIFF, do that and avoid all the other
stupid steps!
Personally, I do ALT-PrintScreen, create a new document in Photoshop,
then CTRL-V to paste the screen copy into the new document. I then
save as TIFF as appropriate. For my professional and personal work,
I have not found that Snag-It or similar utilities provide any
extra value for me. Others may find it convenient, especially if
they don't have Photoshop or Photoshop Elements. BTW, I often convert
the screen shot from standard RGB to indexed-RGB in Photoshop before
saving as TIFF. This works OK for screen shots in which there are
a limited number of colors used, such as in a dialogue box or menu;
it does not work if you need a screen shot of an application with
a complex image in it (such as a screenshot from Photoshop showing
an open photographic image)!
- Dov
At 1/7/2004 10:12 AM, Lindsay Burrell wrote:
>Dov, is the reason for putting the capture into Photoshop (rather than just
>saving as TIFF from Snag-It (or Hypersnap, which we use) something to do
>with the TIFF filter in Photoshop? Are there differences in TIFF filters?
>
>Thanks!
>Lindsay
*
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bounce-framers-139666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:bounce-framers-139666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dov
>Isaacs
>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:05 AM
>To: Framers List
>Cc: framers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; framers@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Need clear screenshots
>
>
>At 1/7/2004 08:57 AM, Steve Rickaby wrote:
>>At 8:45 am -0800 7/1/04, Dov Isaacs wrote:
>>
>>>No, They are already crudded up! It is the process of compressing
>>>them initially into JPEG that cruds them up. Putting them NOW into
>>>TIFF won't help.
>>
>>As this issue, which is topical for me, has come up, how's this for a workflow?
>>
>>Capture -> Paint -> BMP -> Illustrator -> high quality TIFF
>>
>>Any problems with that for screenshots?
>>--
>>Steve
>
>
>Seems like way too many steps!
>
>First of all, you could use the BMP file as-is in FrameMaker,
>although the file itself is not compressed.
>
>Secondly, Illustrator is not really an image-handling program.
>
>Third, better solution is:
>
>Capture=>Photoshop=>TIFF
>
>where "Photoshop" could be Photoshop Elements!
>
> - Dov
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **