[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Chulsky, Mark" <mchulsky@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Superscripts in running headers and footers
From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:15:11 -0500
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AY12q/OGt/FCKliy3ncI6BB0vxoAoM8RmoiukWS4ZqexGXNTKZx7/+ISI0m1TQXk8iJxHyFD5W3PhgVUrpVtbwWmPYAiZrr2NUxeMXBuunWyrNZdvN78nFXSKKelTROuHGKv4JHpdkPek+/f9ih+mMzHLTY2Nk5w0N5cEX98GG8=
In-reply-to: <2DF4D6D7E280EC4DA2FD6EFB60173BF10A2D5A@ad-email1.ad.mc.com>
References: <2DF4D6D7E280EC4DA2FD6EFB60173BF10A2D5A@ad-email1.ad.mc.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
Mark,
What exactly is happening? The supers are out of the footer area, not
showing up at all, not superscript.... something else?
Art
On 11/15/05, Chulsky, Mark <mchulsky@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Our template set generates running headers and footers from various
> part/chapter/section titles using FM standard Running H/F 1,2,3,4
> variables.
>
> This worked fine, until we started to use superscript in the titles. The
> running headers reflect the superscripted text from the titles
> correctly, but the footers do not, even though the variable definitions
> are almost identical.
--
Art Campbell art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent
and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
DoD 358
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **