[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:03:39 -0500
Cc: "hedley.finger@xxxxxxxx" <hedley.finger@xxxxxxxx>, framers@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rKq8hULSaFdp9uS9G8hX1BJOu3vnF37Ni1nWf0Eng/lHM2WJiiS9j7wdW/1F2LWM4J2RxRUHxrEftQBsHpvi8WgWk9T7ofK5H7qIeBCidoQeKQdibw+1Zkpzn9Kyb18sXLygz1bxcB39yF/cRE9V24BCJdunm8NnabdPjeXcnD4=
In-reply-to: <vq15o1phqfit4un1c3itlfg2nn1vc8g7qr@4ax.com>
References: <OF19D8B373.76FE8DEF-ONCA2570C1.0007E2BF-CA2570C1.000A4E45@myob.com.au> <c7d9dd600511211803y19fa0683r53c8e71e8ac67d5d@mail.gmail.com> <vq15o1phqfit4un1c3itlfg2nn1vc8g7qr@4ax.com>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
On 11/21/05, Jeremy H. Griffith <jeremy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:03:15 -0500, Art Campbell
> <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >As much as I admire your spirit... framers is a privately owned commercial
> >list, and the owners are the owners.
>
> WRONG, Wrong, wrong! It is not, never has been, and never
> will be, any more than the ANWR is owned by the oil companies.
> The original framers was a community list that predated the
> takeover by Brad by many years; I was on it back when it was
> hosted on uunet. Brad did not buy the list, because there
> was no-one to buy it from. The *only* other way one can own
> a list is to start it from scratch, asking people to opt-in.
> Brad never did that. Ergo, he never owned it. Simple truth.
In theory I agree. I was on hte uunet list too. However, the theory
ain't the reality. The "other list" is operated under the "possession
is 9/10ths of the law," maxim. And if it actually came to a court
case, they'd have a solid case for ownership.
<anip>
> >As they say in the US (well, some of us say):
> >"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one."
> >A. J. Liebling
>
> Fortunately, the Web has changed that again. ;-)
>
> >And censorship works very well; your message wouldn't have gotten through
> >if there hadn't been another "press" available. (Thanks, Jeremy!)
>
> Which is why there is another press, and always will be, one
> that will *never* be commercial. I don't "own" it, the whole
> community does; I'm the current listadmin, that's all. If I
> no longer want to run it, or if enough members want someone
> else to do that (as a volunteer), I'll pass it on cheerfully.
>
> >And Mailman... I think it's a great little program. Open source. Free.
> >Maybe the archiving isn't as good as Yahoo's, but you don't have the
> >penalty of having your address broadcast either.
>
> <sigh> A few years ago I thought it looked good, too, and
> tried to move Free Framers to it. No good. It just won't
> scale; a couple hundred users strains it, and I have no
> idea how Lisa can manage with the frameusers list on it.
> The trouble is, it's written in interpreted Python... So
> far, I've found no real working substitute for majordomo,
> and I'd dearly love to find one...
Probably time to look at it again, Jeremy. I'm helping run a
three-list Mailman server that's running 1300, 700, & 350 member lists
without breaking a sweat. And a separate install of another list
that's >300 members. No problems.
And because of the user interface, the user accounts are largely
self-maintaining. ;- )
Art
--
Art Campbell art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent
and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
DoD 358
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **