[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[New search]
To: Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:10:31 -0500
Delivered-to: jeremyg-freeframers:org-ffarchiv@freeframers.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ldsGfpzb7uBVUh9Vj+sL64ou7BgZ+4k0lR4jk7cZS3R1p5J2N489Wx/wBnzqeHWFQ8ERatWDEUEtisu8PiJ1Fcfl2IL9JVYPpCS2LNknEddVGW3I4Fc4Xs6y8LY/gq9V6ycrh2nb5+IRyW/AWbnZQCYU7cT/HSxhsymh7IURLh4=
In-reply-to: <BAY106-F154A9D009FBBAAC5170191BA520@phx.gbl>
References: <c7d9dd600511221247p2f1fc6e4hbcc3b891f60653f8@mail.gmail.com> <BAY106-F154A9D009FBBAAC5170191BA520@phx.gbl>
Sender: owner-framers@xxxxxxxxx
I'm sure you're right Fred; I just didn't realize you were so tight
with the admins that you could read their minds.
Those messages I received that indicated otherwise were undoubedly
clever forgeries.
Silly me.
Cheers,
Art
On 11/22/05, Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You must be using a different definition of "moderated" than anyone
> else uses. Except for the first posting when joining the Techwr-l
> list, list members' submissions are posted directly to the list. There is
> no moderator--not Lisa and not anybody else--who has the power
> and responsibility to accept or reject every message before posting.
> According to every definition of "moderated list" that I've ever
> seen (and I just looked at nearly a dozen definitions found by Google,
> including several on the websites of listserv software vendors), that
> describes an unmoderated list.
>
>
>
> >From: Art Campbell <art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >CC: framers@xxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: Censorship alive and well on frameusers
> >Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:47:12 -0500
> >
> >Well, that hasn't been anywhere close to my experience on that list, Fred.
> >I think we can agree to disagree.
> >
> >On 11/22/05, Fred Ridder <docudoc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Sorry, Art, but you are incorrect about the Techwr-l list being
> > > "tightly moderated". It is an unmoderated list. Lisa does monitor
> > > the list fairly closely (as did the previous list administrators)
> > > because it has a long history of quickly veering deeply (and
> > > often passionately) off-topic, but what she does is after-the-fact
> > > monitoring rather than before-the-fact moderation.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>
--
Art Campbell art.campbell@xxxxxxxxx
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent
and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
DoD 358
** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body. **