[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [New search]

RE: Webworks Publisher vs. MIF2RTF

Hello,

I chose MIF2RTF over WWP simply because it was cheaper. It does the 
conversion from Frame to RTF quickly and efficiently, and it is not that 
difficult to use. Combine this with HCW and you have a powerful tool for 
creating Windows Help files. The support I got and still get from Jeremy 
Griffiths is absolutely amazing (don't you ever sleep Jeremy?).  All 
queries are answered promptly and helpfully even though I am situated in 
Perth, Australia on the other side of the world.

I inherited large Frame documents with embedded graphics, and found MIF2RTF 
extremely useful for creating bitmaps of all the graphics for me to archive 
or use in other documents.

David Grieve

Technical Writer - Earth Resource Mapping

-----Original Message-----
From:	Lydia Wong [SMTP:lydiaw@fpoint.com]
Sent:	Friday, 19 March 1999 0:23
To:	framers@FrameUsers.com
Subject:	Re: Webworks Publisher vs. MIF2RTF

..snip
If more users out there want to speak to using both tools, that would be
great for all of us, I think.

Lydia
------------------
Lydia Wong
Technical Writer
FarPoint Technologies, Inc.
www.fpoint.com



_________________________________________________________________________
 (un)subscribe send an email to majordomo@FrameUsers.com with subject of:
  Subscribe: subscribe Framers          Unsubscribe: unsubscribe Framers
             subscribe digest Framers                unsubscribe Framers
_________________________________________________________________________


** To unsubscribe, send a message to majordomo@omsys.com **
** with "unsubscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.   **